« The Day the Entire World Gets RSS | Main | links for 2006-10-10 »

Monday, October 09, 2006

Brand Engagement is a Myth, Like Bigfoot

The following is also my column in this week's Advertising Age...

You Might as Well Be Searching for Bigfoot

In Other Words, the Truth About 'Engagement' Is It's a Myth

Attend a few marketing conferences or read enough ad trade pubs and blogs and you will quickly bump into the "E" word -- engagement. Buzzmetrics, the Advertising Research Foundation and the American Association of Advertising Agencies even launched a blog on the subject last week.

Engagement is, quite frankly, hot air. It's indicative of a systemic issue in the marketing community. We love to create buzzwords to describe new marketing methods when the good ol' outdated ones like blunt interruption don't quite work anymore.

Can anyone really define what "engagement" means? Have you seen it? I Googled "engagement marketing" and found lots of blather written on the subject. It seems to me like no one can really nail it. The closest I could come to a "definition" is the ARF's "Engagement is turning on a prospect to a brand idea enhanced by the surrounding context." Ahh, I get it now!

Yeah, right.

The truth about engagement is that no one can define it because it's a myth. It's sort of like a magical marketing unicorn or Bigfoot. Sure, there are a few fuzzy pictures of it on the internet, but no one has classified the species.

The engagement myth is built on an insatiable desire to get consumers obsessed with our brands. That's because TV advertising ain't what it used to be. Often "engagement" is achieved through digital technology. Problem is, consumers don't want to be "digitally engaged" with us. They're only into each other.

As marketers, we shouldn't care about brand engagement. Instead we should focus on how we get people connected with each other and measure the number of times we helped them do so. That's why venues such as Second Life, YouTube, Facebook and other social networks are so hot: They allow people to connect with each other.

If you want to see engagement, find the right communities, build programs that empower people to connect, then get out of the way. Your brand will get a lift purely through association. Don't search for Bigfoot.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5e1c53ef00d83431275253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brand Engagement is a Myth, Like Bigfoot:

» The big guys join the party? from Deborah Schultz
So while the blogosphere was speculating on the now confirmed Google/YouTube deal over the weekend, the annual ANA Masters of Marketing conference took place in Florida. As reported in the NY Times today as well as on various marketing blogs, [Read More]

» Brand Engagement vs. Social Connectivity from Online Fandom
One of the themes Ive occassionally hit on in this blog is that fandom is not just about celebrities and atheletes, it can also happen around brands (Trader Joes being one exemplar), and smart brands will figure out more and more ways to ... [Read More]

» Fields on Rubel on Brand Engagement via Advertising from Marketing Pop Culture
Congrats to Steve Rubel for finally saying that the emperor has no clothes. Is brand engagement a myth? I’d argue yes, particularly when it purports to come as a result of advertising. Advertising is an awareness vehicle. That’s all it [Read More]

» Next new trend? Selling! from Mike's Points
Steve Rubel/MicroPersuasion has a column this week in "Advertising Age" (and on his blog) about brand engagement being a myth. Now, I'm not going to get into his points and definition of engagement. What I definitely have an issue with... [Read More]

» Engagement Marketing from Karma, Identity, Trust and Reputation on the Web
New York Times had an article today on the problems with the traditional brand campaigns and the emerging field of “engagement” marketing. Check it out here (might be restricted content after today). Marketers of all sorts are now being urged to gi... [Read More]

» Engagement Is... from ANA Marketing Maestros
I have to defend my colleague Mike Palmer and slap my pal Steve Rubel on the knuckle. I think what we have is a failure to communicate. Let’s not get caught up in semantics but remember that the past chair [Read More]

» Who's Really Watching? from AdPulp
There's been some talk recently about what engagement means, if it can stand on its own as a metric, etc. The Advertising Research Foundation defines engagement as "turning on a prospect to a brand idea enhanced by the surrounding... [Read More]

» Catch & Release from PR Squared
Yesterday I had the honor of sitting alongside Micro Persuasion's Steve Rubel at the BDI/PRNewswire conference, Communications 2.0 - the Future of PR. The panel discussion that ensued echoed many of the thoughts Steve brought up in his rece... [Read More]

Comments

Search


My Photo

Follow Me on Twitter

Subscribe

Contact Me


  • Email Me

  • My Employer

Read My Favorite Feeds

Miscellany

Related Posts Widget for Blogs by LinkWithin