Main | May 2004 »

April 2004

Friday, April 30, 2004

BlueHereNow Dishes Out A Cake Mix of News From Mobloggers and Pros

I just stumbled across a company called BlueHereNow that aims to blend professional and participatory journalism into a rather potent cocktail of information.

BlueHereNow aggregates stories and photos from the pros with selected contributions from mobloggers. What's even more odd, is that they use story and subject popularity to build an editorial direction that "responds to the true interests of the online community." Does this mean all Britney all the time? I guess we'll never hear about what's happening in Latvia anymore. Shucks.

BlueHereNow makes its content available to anyone who wants to syndicate it through XML and RDF feeds as well as through a more powerful syndication tool.

The image below is an overview of their model. Personal journalists are encouraged to submit stories here. It's not clear if PR pros can submit items.

Help Wanted: Must Know How to Ramble Aimlessly

InfoWorld is looking for a reporter ... with blogging experience.

"Prospective candidates can expect to write at least one online news story daily, and experience in blogging is a plus."

Via themediadrop.

Magablogs Rising

Folio: has a piece on the rise of magazine blogs.

Excerpt:

"There are lonely teenagers cyber-begging for attention. There are passionate and articulate experts sharing their insights. There are outright lunatics. These are the residents of the blogosphere, an online realm ruled by the egalitarian ideal of an individual communicating without the filter of established media.

Lately, however, established media have glommed on to blogging. Magazines as diverse as Variety, Christianity Today, Business 2.0, The New Republic and The American Prospect are sponsoring their own blogs, committing editing time, money, prominent space on their Websites and their journalistic reputations to a format that was supposed to be all about amateurs controlling the microphone.

Are these new “magablogs” the tip of a trend? Will blogs, like Websites, become an essential adjunct to print magazines and a source of badly needed revenue? Or will magazine bloggery remain a quirky offshoot of a magazine’s Internet presence-a marketing gimmick that gives the brand a dose of hipness and provides an ego boost for star writers?

The answer is yes. Magazine blogs are promotional tools and they are becoming useful (and possibly sponsorship-ready) adjuncts to print and online brands, particularly in the b-to-b category."

Topix.net CEO Rich Skrenta on How Blogs Amplify Traditional PR

richs

Shortly after this blog launched I received an intriguing email from Topix.net CEO Rich Skrenta about how his company fused blog PR and traditional media relations to help build brand awareness. Rich agreed to take this to the next step with an email interview, resulting in the second in my ongoing series of Micro Persuasion’s “Bloggerside Chats” with CEOs, bloggers, PR professionals and journalists.

Prior to joining Topix, Rich held a variety of senior roles at Netscape/America Online, including including Director of Engineering for Netscape Search, AOL Music, and AOL Shopping. He joined Netscape/AOL upon its purchase of NewHoo/The Open Directory Project, where he was Co-founder & CEO. By the way, Topix has a great page to keep up with PR industry news.

[Note: Topix.net is not a client of CooperKatz & Company, where I am employed.] If there’s someone else you think that my readers (journalists, marketing and PR pros) would benefit in hearing from, please drop me an email.

Q) Rich, what is the long term plan for Topix.net? And what did you learn from your days with NewHoo/Netscape about running an Internet business in what I am calling the Internet renaissance?

SKRENTA: There's way too much information on the net for humans to make sense of, so automation is needed. In the search engines this takes the form of clever algorithms to help users locate relevant websites quickly.

Topix is applying search engine and AI algorithms to the discovery and delivery of news. Since news is an editorial product, there's even more opportunity to create differentiated products than with a web index or catalog.

Running an Internet business provides the opportunity to track business metrics in real time at a very detailed level. There's a lot in common between ecommerce and direct marketing. You have to know the right questions to ask, do proper A/B studies to determine what works and what doesn't, and let the market tell you where to take your product rather than relying on personal guesses.

Q) Your site provides local news for every ZIP code in the country, more than 30,000 cities and towns in all. And your system is completely automated. Some newspapers, like in Spokane, are enlisting bloggers to help them cover local news. What role do bloggers and personal journalists play on your site? Do you have plans to "slurp" their RSS feeds?

SKRENTA: Blogs take several forms. Some are heavy on quoting and linking; for those, we'd rather index the original sources directly than through a blog. Others write high-quality article-length original material; those are the kinds of sources we'd like to add to our system.

Currently weblogs make up just 1% of the sources we are crawling. But I'm very excited about participatory journalism. If blogging helps folks get out and write about their community, that's great content being generated at the hyperlocal level.

Q) What are your most trafficked topics/zip codes?

SKRENTA: About 50% of our traffic is on the local pages vs. the subject pages. The traffic is spread pretty evenly across the site though. Traffic on local pages pretty much corresponds to population density.

Q) In your email to me you said that the blogosphere is making Internet PR easier and more cost effective now than it was five years ago and that you started Topix'net's campaign with single IM to an influential blogger. Who did you start with and why? Why a blogger and not say, John Markoff of The New York Times?

SKRENTA: We started with Mike Masnick of TechDirt. I've been reading TechDirt daily for years and thought Topix.net was on-topic for his site and that he'd be interested in hearing about it. This was a pre-launch, so we were purposely testing the waters with savvy net-heads before approaching the mainstream press. We wanted to get feedback from a more forgiving crowd to help us refine our message before going to the next step.

Mike wrote up a nice entry about us, and it spawned a halo of attention and linking. It was a perfect soft-launch for us.

Q) After your launch it sounds like you moved into a more traditional media relations campaign. You have had extensive coverage in eWeek and The Seattle Times and elsewhere. Did you simply work with bloggers just for the launch or did you continue the dialog? Did big media pick up on what the bloggers wrote? Do you use bloggers to seed stories into the general press?

SKRENTA: We've definitely continued the dialogue. What we found was that after our mainstream PR launch the blogs provided a second boost of traffic. The Mercury News, Seattle Times, etc. coverage was great. But each time an article came out in the mainstream press, the blogs would augment the effect by focusing even more attention on the stories we were getting. It amplified the value of the traditional PR effort that we did.

We can also more finely tailor announcements to bloggers that cover a specific area of interest. With a publication like a metro newspaper, you need a big story to get their attention. Everything we do isn't necessarily worthy of that kind of coverage, but there are often interest groups that do like to hear about smaller developments.

An example is our expansion from 3,000 to 6,000 sources. This had a lot of interest for the research librarian community, and we got coverage on Gary Price's ResourceShelf.com and in Tara Calishain's ResearchBuzz.com. When we announced our integration of the commercial KeepMedia story archives, on the other hand, we were covered by Rafat Ali of PaidContent.org.

To do this right you need to know who's writing about what, and why. It's very focused PR instead of a shotgun approach.

Q) What is your vision of the future of participatory media/blogging?

SKRENTA: The blogosphere is a great platform for netizens to conduct public dialogue. We haven't decided how we're going to best include all this material in Topix.net, so we're proceeding conservatively, adding sources that meet our editorial review standards for article-length posts.

Q) What's the best piece of advice you can offer other CEOs and marketing/PR execs interested in working with personal journalists? What tips can you share?

SKRENTA: It's essential to understand what individual bloggers write about and what angle of your pitch might be most interesting to them.

Also, it's helpful to have your own blog, so you can participate in the conversation. The blogosphere doesn't like megaphone-PR pointed at them; they'd rather have a conversation with you. This can be a great source of feedback from your most influential users.

Q) Is there anything else you feel my readers (PR pros and journalists) should know about what I call "micro persuasion" (e.g. using blogs and participatory journalism to convey key messages)?

SKRENTA: The net isn't a one-way broadcast medium. That's not only because it can talk back -- it's also because there are so many narrow interest groups that a single message isn't appropriate to send out to every participant on the net.

Companies have an opportunity to involve net users in the development of their messaging and their products. Companies often conduct small focus groups to find out what users think about their stuff; but with bloggers, you have a large, ongoing, literate group willing to give you high-quality feedback in real time about what you're doing. Keep them informed, and listen to what they have to say.

Thursday, April 29, 2004

Moblogging Will Revolutionize PR

As I sit on a train using my BlackBerry I cannot help but think about the potential impact Moblogging - or blogging via wireless devices - will have on the PR practice.

Moblogging is already turning thousands of young, tech savvy folks into amateur, personal journalists... especially those lucky enough to own camera phones. Perhaps more than any other technology, Moblogging has the power to revolutionize PR.

First, as these devices become more sophisticated, news will travel faster. Voyeurs who spot celebrities in less than flattering situations will thrill in the chance to break the news online before the pros do.

Second, it will give PR people the chance to respond to a crisis more quickly than ever before. Imagine if I could calm a negative story via a single blog post from anywhere in the world, no matter when news breaks.

I have yet to hear of a single PR pro that is using Moblogging, but it won't be long.

Euro Socialist Candidate Blogs to Combat Voter Apathy

Think only American pols blog? Think again!

The Malta Independent Daily Website writes that the Party of European Socialists (PES) is actually launching a Weblogs to counter voter apathy. Party president Poul Nyrup Rasmussen has chosen May Day to begin publication of his personal view on the campaign across 25 countries.

The four-language Euroblog will be published on the PES website and will appear daily until election day in June, giving former Danish premier Mr Rasmussen’s inside story about the ups and downs of the European campaign.

Visitors to the website will be able to take up issues raised by Mr Rasmussen and post their views.

Howard Dean, you have competition.

BBC Asks Readers for Help in Covering a Story

Poynter reports that BBC News yesterday asked its readers for help in covering a breaking news story when shots were heard in Damascus. Nobody knew exactly what was happening. When the BBC's own reporter couldn't add much background very fast, the organization published some basics online and asked its readers to add more details: "Are you in the Damascus area? Did you witness the blasts? Send us your comments using the form below." Reader comments and an article are posted on the site right now.

Q&A with Robert Scoble on Blogging, Media and PR

robertscobleheadshot

Robert Scoble, Technical Evangelist, Platform Evangelism at Microsoft, pens Scobleizer, one of the Web’s most influential blogs. He has thousands of readers and is frequently quoted in the tech and business press. (Recommended reading: recent articles on Scoble in the New York Post and Seattle P-I).

Scoble has been blogging for three years and before that helped plan conferences at Fawcette Technical Publications, and was director of marketing for UserLand Software, a developer of Weblog and content management software. Previously he was a sales support manager at NEC.

Scoble has been involved in online communities for more than a decade. He says he has been fiddling around with personal computers since the late 1970s, when his dad bought home an Apple II. He grew up about a mile from Apple Computer's headquarters in Silicon Valley.

Recently I conducted an email interview with Robert on his experiences working with PR pros. This is the first in series of "Bloggerside Chats" I plan to run on this blog. If there's someone you feel my readers would enjoy hearing from, please send a note my way. The full Q&A follows.

Robert, in the past year or two your Scobleizer has grown quite a bit. Are you now pitched by PR people and, if so, what about? Are you ever interrupted by phone pitches during business hours?

SCOBLE: Occasionally, yes. Mostly they're not Microsoft-based PR folks and they just want to make me aware of their products. Sometimes folks inside Microsoft will see that I wrote about their teams and will give me more information. The Windows Media team, for instance, brought over a case of devices and let me play with them so that I'd be better informed about what they are doing.

How well do you feel the PR community understands blogging/news aggregating?

SCOBLE: Some people really understand it very well. Renee Blodgett, for instance, runs PR for NewsGator, which is a RSS News Aggregator that plugs into Outlook.

Others are outwardly afraid of it. At the Demo Conference a PR professional told me that bloggers freak her out. Why? Because PR professionals are paid to control a company's message. If you have all of your employees blogging there's a fear that there will be a lack of control.

Do you think PR pros approach bloggers like yourself the same way they might approach a journalist? How should PR pros approach bloggers and what should they expect from their efforts to influence them?

SCOBLE: Some are now, but mostly they don't even know that we exist, and if they do know, they assume that because we have small audiences that we aren't powerful. For instance, I have only 4000 readers. Not powerful, right? Especially in a world of Dan Gillmors and Walt Mossbergs. But, the weblog world is distributed and efficient at passing information around.

What do I mean? Well, two weeks ago we launched Channel9 and already we've had several hundred thousand visits.

Buzz Bruggeman, who is CEO for ActiveWords, told me that he was written up in USA Today. Got a really great review. The kind that PR professionals kill for. And he got 40 downloads of his product. But when I linked to him he got several hundred downloads. Lesson? Don't underestimate the weblog world.

What journalistic ethics do you feel bloggers should abide by, if any, since they're not actually journalists?

SCOBLE: You only get one chance at keeping your site credible. If you lie to your readers it'll be quickly figured out.

The rest of it? Be smart. Read my Corporate Weblogger Manifesto. That covers the basics.

What is the future of micromedia? Do you feel that blogs and participatory journalism will one day replace mainstream media in the future?

SCOBLE: No, but it will change. Why? What happens during the next big earthquake, for instance, in California? Will the hundred or so journalists that work for the San Jose Mercury News be able to cover the story very well? No. There are thousands of people who live in San Jose who are bloggers. The trick for the mainstream media is to figure out how to work with bloggers. Already some of them are doing just that. Many journalists are reading blogs to gather news. Many others are keeping blogs themselves and building ties to the community.

But, will I replace Walt Mossberg? Heck no. I am not able to cover the industry objectively the way he does. I also don't have a content distribution channel (which is exactly what the Wall Street Journal is) that'd get my content to millions of people. I don't harbor thoughts of putting Walt or other journalists out of work.

What is your interaction like with Microsoft's corporate communications department and/or their PR firms? Do they ever critique your posts or even pitch you? What about competitors?

SCOBLE: They are friendly to me and trying to figure out the new world. They don't need to pitch me. I work hard to understand what Microsoft is doing and it's part in the world. Usually the people who pitch me are other employees who are simply excited by what they are working on. The SPOT watch team, for instance, contacted me one day and said "come over and check out what we're doing." Lots of other teams have done the same thing, particularly now that Channel9 has had some success.

Recently you wrote a post about persuasion. How do you feel about PR pros launching corporate blogs to persuade public opinion? What tips can you offer PR pros considering launching blogs for internal/external clients?

SCOBLE: Be careful about doing it. Read that post carefully. You'll see that there's two philosophies on how to persuade. One works online with people who can research what you're saying and can talk to each other.

One doesn't. Why is that? Read that rant and find out why. If you blog make sure you do it to become an authority on the topic you're writing about. If you see it as another way to post press releases you'll do yourself and your company a lot of harm.

What is the impact RSS on PR and on blogging?

SCOBLE: In any population of, say, 1000 people, there are 15 who are just ultra knowledgeable, passionate, and are seen as authorities that the rest of the population looks up to. For instance, how big is the US? How many Walt Mossbergs are there?

These people are connectors. Influentials. The press. The analysts. Now, how can they get information most efficiently? Email? Nope. Ever look at a journalist's in box? Ask Dan Gillmor of the San Jose Mercury News, for instance, to show you his inbox (he even pleas with PR professionals to only send him relevant emails, read this).

The Web? Nope. Think about it. You're a journalist or an influential. You need to watch 100 companies (and some companies, like Microsoft, are really more like 100 companies in of themselves -- there are entire Web sites, for instance, like WatchingMicrosoftLikeaHawk.com or ActiveWin or Microsoft Monitor that keep tabs on Microsoft). Can you do that efficiently with a Web browser No. Why not?

Well, most companies don't publish new info every day. With RSS I only need to read a site when they actually publish something. The SPOT watch team, for instance, has only had a few times that they need to communicate with the world. Why should I visit every day with a Web browser? Why should someone like Walt Mossberg?

Why did you choose to launch an aggregation blog?

SCOBLE: Because I was watching 1430 RSS feeds (I couldn't have done that if I only had a Web browser) and I was finding fascinating things that I wanted to make sure the world saw. Most people can't keep up with 1400 news sources (in my RSS aren't just blogs, but news sources like the BBC, the New York Times, CNET, etc) but most people can watch a single blog that serves as an aggregation point.
That's why I did it, and it was very popular. I've temporarily stopped doing it because of copyright concerns, but it'll be back soon in a new form.

Finally, how does your blog synergize with Microsoft's marketing efforts to energize the developer community behind .NET and Longhorn?

SCOBLE: Oh, I don't really see myself as synergizing with Microsoft's marketing efforts, but generally I try to make my readers aware of important things that are happening. I also point at things our competitors are doing that are cool, and point at things that I think my readers should know. I meet a lot of really interesting people in the industry and get to see a lot of technology in its early stages, so I try to share my insights with my readers. That's why a blog is different from marketing. It can help marketing, sure, but if you really want an audience you better serve your readers first and any corporate concerns second.

Wednesday, April 28, 2004

Scoble Q&A on Blogging and PR Coming Tomorrow

I Just completed an email interview on bloggers and PR with Robert Scoble, Technical Evangelist, Platform Evangelism at Microsoft. Mr. Scoble pens Scobleizer, one of most read Weblogs in the Blogosphere.

Here's how Robert describes his blogging experience:

"I've been blogging for three years, before that I helped plan conferences at Fawcette Technical Publications, and was director of marketing for UserLand Software, which is a developer of weblog and content management software, and a sales support manager at NEC.

I've been involved in online communities for more than a decade, and have been fiddling around with personal computers since the late 1970s, when my dad bought home an Apple II (I was very fortunate to grow up about a mile from Apple Computer's headquarters too in Silicon Valley)."

This is the first in a series of email interviews I plan to run on this site with influential bloggers, PR pros and CEOs. I will post the full interview tomorrow.

Books Get Napsterized

Toronto Globe and Mail has an story on how the rise of print-on-demand technology and Web sites devoted to self publishing are making it ever easier for writers to bypass conventional publishers.

Colors Editor Says Blogs Raised His Mag's Profile

IWantMedia has an interview with Simon Dumenco, editor of Colors magazine, that touches on the impact bloggers had in building the magazine's buzz.

IWM: You have written articles about blogs, and bloggers have written about you. Have blogs helped heighten your profile?

Dumenco: Well, first I'll say that I find the majority of my readers in the U.S. still seem to find me in print first. But bloggers do make a difference. And sites like I Want Media really do matter. When you link to one of my media columns, you're immediately putting me on the radar screens of a perfect, targeted audience of media-minded readers. Which is wonderful.

I'll also note that bloggers certainly seem to have brought me many readers in foreign countries, and non-U.S. readers have been particularly supportive -- perhaps because I have a rather sour take on the absurdities of American media and pop culture. I routinely get e-mail from English-speaking readers in the U.K., Australia, Canada, Spain, Italy and France.

Online Affiliate Programs as "PR on Steroids"

Rob Key from Converseon has penned a byliner for iMedia Connection on how marketers can create affiliate programs that complement big-game-hunting PR programs. Sounds like Micro Persuasion to me. Key offers some good tips as well and covers blogs quite a bit.

All too often, public relations efforts focus on major media and overlook the opportunity to infuse editorial into an affiliate program with potentially thousands of sites that, in aggregate, can deliver greater reach and a larger audience.

Does PhotoShop Mean We Can't We Trust What We See?

An op-ed piece in Newsday today by Ken Light, curator of the Center for Photography at the University of California, Berkeley, and a documentary photographer, asks if we can trust what we see.

Ken writes:

"Anybody with Internet access and an interest in John Kerry has probably seen my photograph by now, or the part of it that I made.

The other part is a fake, a visual lie. There's an Associated Press credit down in the right corner. That's also a lie. John Kerry never shared a demonstration podium with Jane Fonda. But the fact that a widely circulated photo showed him doing so until it was exposed a few months ago as a hoax tells us a lot about the troublesome combination of the computer program PhotoShop, and others, and the Internet."

As noted earlier on this blog, newspapers are also increasingly using images shot by the general public in their stories. As PhotoShop and other digital tools get easier to use and cheaper, will this continue? Will PR people need to prove that their images are legit?

World Economic Forum Gets Blogged

Joi Ito notes that the World Economic Forum now has a blog. Even more interesting, the WEF blogged their disclaimer.

VH-1 Gets Participatory Media

Fast Company has an interesting article on how VH-1 used comments posted on their blog to develop ideas for their new show.

In the months leading up to the debut of "Best Week Ever," a new show in VH-1's lineup that makes a nostalgic nod at our warp-speed culture, executive producer Fred Graver set up an internal blog. He hoped it would be a way for the show's writers to brainstorm commentary about the latest celebrity gaffes and quirky of-the-minute news.

But when the show launched in mid-January, he made the decision to open up the blog to the Internet. Just one week in, more than half the comments posted on the blog were coming from random stoppers-by, giving the writers ideas for show material.

Tuesday, April 27, 2004

Google Support Confirms Gmail Threading Bug

UPDATE: This post was blogged on Upian's Hot Links and on Jeremy Zawodny's Linkblog.

I am going to test out my theory that "personal journalists" are having an impact by doing some reporting of my own and watching if this spreads online.

As some of you know, I have a Google Gmail account. Now don't get me wrong. I love Google. I live on it. And I am thrilled they are launching an email service. It's speedy, it has massive storage, I like the contextual ads and I like the conversation threading features ... if they get them fixed.

I am using my blog to report that Gmail, in beta, has a conversation threading bug that Google has confirmed to me via email. They say they are working on it. I am sure they are. I am posting this not to bash them, but to monitor if or how this spreads.

Basically, when I send out multiple emails to multiple recipients that share the exact same subject header, they all get grouped together. I got confused today by the bug...I couldn't follow who I was sending email to.

Here's the thread from their support team, confirming the bug. Let's see who picks this up. If you blog me, please trackback this so the group can see the results. Thanks.

Gmail Team (gmail-support@google.com) Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 3:18PM
To: steverubel (at) gmail . com
Hello Steve,

Thank you for your report. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to fix this at this time. We are, however, aware of the problem and the engineering team is working on a fix.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Please keep in mind this is a preview release of Gmail, and we appreciate your patience during our limited test period.

Sincerely,
The Gmail Team

Original Message Follows:
------------------------
From: steverubel (at) gmail . com
Subject: I send multiple emails with the same subject to multiple recipients. Even though each is a separate thread they all get threaded together. Please advise how to remedy.
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 19:06:00 -0000

Hi. When I send out separate emails to recipients using the same subject line and I get replies, they get threaded together when really they are separate conversations. How can I fix this? Thanks.

GmailAddress: steverubel (at) gmail . com
QuestionTopic: conv_threading
Name: Steve Rubel
OS: winxp
Browser: Internet Explorer 6.x

OregonLive.com Reporter to Blog Public Inquest

JD Lasica reports that Ethan Daniel Lindsey, a freelance reporter and blogger living in Portland, Ore., has been hired by OregonLive.com to blog a public inquest.

Update - this post has been corrected to read OregonLive.com.

IBM Gets Participatory Media

Poynter's E-Media Tidbits notes that IBM has published a white paper (PDF) on their Web site called Media and Entertainment 2010.

IBM's Saul J. Berman contends that between now and 2010, as technology becomes more powerful and affordable, an increasing segment of consumers will be able to compile, program, edit, create and share content, resulting in greater consumer immersion in media experiences.

I’m not sure why Big Blue is saying “by 2010.” This is actually happening now. It cost me $80/year to set up this blog on TypePad. Had I opted to use Blogger, it would have cost me nothing. Still, there’s a lot of interesting points in the IBM white paper, which is written for media and entertainment executives, but has implications for PR.

In the executive summary, Berman writes:

We foresee growing participation in media experiences well beyond traditional media, in three additional sectors we have labeled multi-media, “big” media and pervasive media. Successful companies, in transforming their business models to serve these four distinct channels and behaviors, will continue to reposition and restructure. They will focus on the core components that create value for their customers and consumers, divest unneeded properties, improve the monetization of assets – and importantly, join with other players to achieve scale, lower costs and offer value-added products and services.

We call this business model the “open media company of the future” – a dynamic media business that:

* Opens the media experience: Leverages advances in technology to provide customers and consumers a more involved experience with the media firm

* Opens content reserves: Develops accessible, flexible digital content systems that can enable distribution to virtually any media context

* Opens content creation and distribution: Establishes digitized processes that monitor and incorporate input from customers and consumers to garner their attention

* Opens content packaging, bundling and sales strategies: Utilizes variable pricing models that enable partners to advertise and share profits, and enables consumers to access content through more compelling release schedules.

If I find more interesting nuggets as I delve into the 44-page document a bit further, I will post them here.

Monday, April 26, 2004

Money Makes the Blogosphere Go Round

Tom Hespos thinks that bloggers are closing in on ways to make money from their passion.

Hespos writes:

Given the time they spend reporting news, scouring the 'net for interesting things to comment on, and cranking out the content their visitors want to see, wouldn't it be nice if a paycheck was involved?

Maybe if Tom is right this will alleviate B.L. Ochman's concerns that PR folks are resistant to tracking bloggers. Why? Bloggers will become even more fervent if they find a way to make money. And fervency is every PR person's dream/nightmare.

Seeking PR Case Studies for This Blog

If you frequently work with bloggers and personal journalists as part of a multi-faceted public relations program, please email me. I am interested in running a series of Q&As on this Weblog with both PR professionals (agency or client side) and key influencers.

My Photo

Search


Subscribe

My Lifestream

Contact Me

Recent Comments

Miscellany